Loading live prices...

Only 17% of European Crypto Companies Licensed Before MiCA Deadline

Registration for the European Union’ Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation will close on July 1, 2026. Despite the close deadline, out of over 1,200 crypto companies that have been operating under national registrations before MiCA, only approximately 210 companies have been granted a full Crypto Asset Service Provider (CASP) license, leaving 83% of companies unlicensed. The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) previously stated that no intermediate or pending status would be given to firms without a license. Any company operating with EU customers after July 1 that doesn’t have an approved MiCA license will be operating outside of EU law.

A Bitcoin coin, scales of justice, a gavel, and a locked EU shield in front of an EU flag.
Daniel Mercer
Written by Daniel Mercer
Updated Jun 18, 2026 3 min. read
|

MiCA Enforcement Highlights: The New European Crypto Regulatory Era

  • According to current statistics, there are only around 210 companies out of more than 1,200+ crypto businesses in Europe holding a MiCA CASP license.
  • Authorities announced companies with application “in progress” by July 1 will be forbidden to operate.
  • Licensed entities will be able to offer their goods and services throughout all member states of the EU (totaling 27 countries/states).
  • Jurisdiction of MiCA is determined by where the client is, not where the company is headquartered. Non-EU international platforms that operate without an authorized European entity will be subject to the same penalties.

How MiCA Will Shape A Unified European Crypto Regulatory Landscape

Before MiCA was enacted, crypto exchanges in Europe, as well as custodians and brokers operated under individual national Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) registries. Due to different rules across countries, smaller and less well-funded firms could exploit weaker regulations to offer services to European clients.

The ultimate objective of MiCA is to unite this fragmented system into a single, unified framework. To obtain a CASP license under MiCA, crypto companies have to prove institutional-grade standards across several criteria including corporate governance, client asset segregation, prudential capital safeguards, and strict market abuse prevention. The companies that do obtain a license can offer crypto asset trading services across the entire EU market.

Current data indicates that even though the licensing process has already been initiated, only 210 out of over 1,200 companies, meaning 17% of the firms have obtained the necessary permits.

Market Consolidation and Structural Change Under MiCA

Trading activity could flow to legal entities like the licensed bigger exchanges when hundreds of smaller unlicensed exchanges close. Capital flows may create short-term market friction and localised volatility for specific assets. We have seen this happen already, when MiCA affected crypto coins designed to hold the same value: crypto market liquidity moving out of Europe because of regulation enforcement on tokens like USDT drove crypto markets into MiCA-compliant stablecoins.

As the new MiCA licensing regime is being enforced, the European crypto ecosystem could possibly face the following changes:

  • A wave of mergers and acquisitions where licensed CASPs are acquiring user bases and regional assets of smaller firms that failed to get licenses on time.
  • Countries with earlier-built and robust crypto regulatory frameworks, such as France, Ireland, and Luxembourg, positioning themselves as the dominant financial hubs of the European Web3 capital.
  • The fully compliant service providers offering a safer environment for large-scale corporate and bank investments in cryptocurrencies.
  • A slowdown, or even halt, in the launch of low-cost and lightly regulated crypto startups in Europe due to strict MiCA requirements that include regular audits, asset-segregation monitoring, and reporting.

Assessing the Benefits and Drawbacks of MiCA

To help digital asset managers and compliance officers better understand this major regulatory transition, TradeBlock experts have prepared a straightforward benefits and drawbacks guide.

Benefits

  • Compliant companies can offer services across all 27 EU member states

  • Mandatory asset segregation and strict governance will take crypto to the same level of security as traditional banking

  • Europe will establish the first clear and unified regulatory framework for digital assets

  • Fully audited tokens will gain prominence over speculative assets

  • Elimination of legal loopholes will prevent bad actors from using weaker member states to target EU users

Drawbacks

  • Licensed platforms may face operational capacity and system infrastructure challenges due to increased number of users

  • Mid-sized operators may struggle with the heavy financial cost of maintaining compliance

  • Rules on customer location mean non-EU platforms will be heavily fined if they continue to offer services to European users

  • Strict reserve requirements for stablecoins could trigger liquidity shortages if they fail to meet the standards

  • Smaller exchanges that cannot afford full licensing will be forced to shut down or liquidate

Concluding Remarks on MiCA's Regulatory Transition

The July 1 deadline for MiCA licensing is an important turning point for the digital asset economy. Even though the current licensing rate of 17% is drastically low, European regulators are adamant about prioritizing systemic market safety and institutional-grade compliance.

Compliance Regulation
Daniel Mercer
Daniel is an experienced author with a background in financial journalism. He writes about digital assets and crypto with a focus on clear, risk-aware explanations rather than hype, approaches price predictions cautiously and prioritises verifiable facts over exaggerated market expectations. When sharing cryptocurrency research and news, exchange reviews, and crypto gambling articles, Daniel's aim is to highlight topics that might not receive the attention they deserve, such as fees, custody, proof of reserves and more. His articles here on TradeBlock are intended for informational purposes only and do not constitute financial advice.